Skip to content

Backfill · 2025

#123 of 383

Noom vs. MyFitnessPal Tracking

seq 10
ObserverNew product/launchhealth_wellnessmixed
habit behaviordigital experience
Basic NeedsWho to Listen To2/9
NoomMyFitnessPal
ImagePress/product shot

Press shot: two smartphone screens side by side, one showing the Noom app with green-yellow-red food categories and a daily article, the other showing the MyFitnessPal calorie tracking dashboard with a numerical food log.

162 words

Noom and MyFitnessPal both track food intake, but the design philosophies behind them differ enough that using each one feels like a different relationship with eating. Noom uses a color-coded system where foods are green, yellow, or red based on caloric density. Daily articles and coaching sessions frame weight management as a psychology problem rather than a math problem. MyFitnessPal is a calorie counter with a barcode scanner and a database of 14 million foods. Its interface is built around a numerical budget where you subtract each meal from your daily target. I have mixed feelings about both. Noom's coaching feels patronizing after the first week, and MyFitnessPal's calorie math can become obsessive. Still, the fundamental design choice between behavior change and data tracking is interesting. Noom costs $70 per month while MyFitnessPal is free with a $20 per month premium tier. That price difference reflects Noom's bet that people will pay for guided support over raw data.