Skip to content

Backfill · 2022

#114 of 357

Bon Appetit Test Kitchen Videos

seq 2
PragmatistHeritage/craft discoveryfood_drinkpositive
wellbeing self caredigital experience
NoticingFeeling HopefulActionGroup Security4/9
Bon Appetit
ImageEditorial/lifestyle

Editorial/lifestyle: a still from a Bon Appetit YouTube video showing a chef in a blue apron working at a stainless steel counter in the test kitchen, camera crew visible in the background.

180 words

Bon Appetit's YouTube channel made cooking content watchable by turning the test kitchen into a workplace sitcom where the recipes are almost secondary to the personalities of the chefs. That format worked because it made professional cooking feel accessible and entertaining rather than instructional. Real employees of the magazine appear in the videos testing recipes, developing new dishes. Occasionally failing on camera, and the willingness to show failure is what made the content feel trustworthy rather than polished. Handheld camerawork and quick editing gives the videos an energy that traditional recipe content lacks, closer to a vlog than a cooking show. The channel peaked around 2019 and 2020 before a controversy about pay equity led to several popular hosts leaving. The format they established has influenced how every food media company approaches video content since. I watched it not because I was going to make the recipes, though I did occasionally. Because the dynamic between the chefs was genuinely entertaining and the production values were high enough to feel professional without feeling corporate. A cluttered, stainless-steel space with other people working in the background, the test kitchen became a character in the show. That spatial honesty added to the feeling that you were watching real work happen rather than a performance. The recipe content benefited from this framing because the chefs would explain why they made specific choices, not just what to do. That reasoning made me a better cook even when I did not follow the exact recipe.