Skip to content

Backfill · 2021

#164 of 315

Disposable Camera Revival

seq 7
PragmatistCrisis/seasonal responsetechdesire
social impactnostalgia revival
Who to Listen ToFeeling HopefulActionExploreGroup SecuritySomething Bigger6/9
ImagePress/product shot

Press shot: A yellow Kodak FunSaver disposable camera sitting on a table next to a stack of developed 4x6 prints, some showing the characteristic warm tones and soft focus of disposable camera photos.

133 words

Disposable cameras from Kodak and Fuji have reappeared at parties, weddings, and college events. The appeal isn't image quality, which is objectively terrible by modern standards. It's the constraints that force a different relationship with photography. You get 27 exposures, no preview screen, no delete option, and no idea what the photos look like until the roll is developed a week later. Uncertainty creates anticipation that digital photography eliminated entirely. The flash is harsh, the colors are saturated in a distinctly analog way, and people associate that look with authenticity because it can't be easily replicated with a phone filter. I bought one for $15 at a drugstore before a friend's birthday party. The photos came back with the soft blur and color cast I expected. Half the shots were overexposed or poorly framed. But the 4 or 5 good ones had a candid quality that phone photos of the same night didn't capture, because nobody posed for the disposable camera the way they pose for a phone.